Analyzing potential scenarios

I can provide analysis based on scenarios, like what the law states about contact not being enough, or distinguishing between “ball not in play” versus “foul occurred before.” It's important to know which match we’re discussing, so I should ask for details and offer to look it up. A general takeaway could be that a correct decision outcome can sometimes stem from flawed reasoning. The user's statement might mean they need a summary or commentary. If they quoted a headline, I could ask if they want a quick summary or clarification on the differences in rationale.Considering news options

If the user wants a news link, I can fetch it. My guidelines suggest I should only ask when necessary, so I can propose specific numeric options. I'll reply in Chinese with concise choices:

1. Quick background + technical interpretation without external links, explaining common scenarios where “not a penalty” but “reason is flawed,” citing relevant law codes.
2. Check details for a specific match if provided, including key timelines, referee statements, VAR involvement, and comparisons with former referees.
3. Create a 30-second script or three-part social media copy if they're writing or making a video.

I won't make network calls until the user approves.